4.4 Review

Bicuspid aortic valve and its ascending aortopathy

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 538-545

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000001276

关键词

aortic aneurysm; aortic dissection; bicuspid aortic valve; bicuspid aortopathy; congenital heart disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this review is to summarize and critically evaluate recent clinical and research advancements in pediatric BAV and its associated aortopathy. Recent findings show that progressive aortic dilation is commonly present in pediatric patients with BAV and is associated with increased risk for aortic aneurysm, dissection, and surgery in adulthood. Ongoing research aims to explore the cause, incidence, and progression of bicuspid aortopathy to improve early diagnosis and preventive management.
Purpose of reviewTo synthesize and critically assess recent clinical and research advancements in pediatric bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and its associated aortopathy.Recent findingsIn pediatric patients with BAV, progressive aortic dilation (i.e. bicuspid aortopathy) is commonly present and associated with increased risk for aortic aneurysm, dissection, and surgery in adulthood. Ongoing research explores the cause, incidence, and progression of bicuspid aortopathy to promote earlier diagnosis and improve preventive management. Recent findings include: high familial incidence and need for improved familial screening; safety of recreational physical activity in most affected children; potential for medical management to slow aortic growth; feasibility of pediatric registries to evaluate longitudinal outcomes; and potential genetic and hemodynamic biomarkers for disease risk stratification.SummaryPediatric bicuspid aortopathy is an important area for investigation and preventive management to improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Recent literature promotes familial screening, recreational exercise, medical prophylaxis, registry-based longitudinal evaluation, and continued scientific inquiry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据