4.7 Article

Heteroepitaxial Growth of Single-Crystalline β-Ga2O3 on GaN/Al2O3 Using MOCVD

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.3c00318

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation of n-Ga2O3/p-GaN heterojunctions has been intensively studied due to the lack of p-Ga2O3. In this work, single-crystalline β-Ga2O3 is grown on a GaN (001)/Al2O3 substrate using MOCVD, and an abrupt heterojunction without a noticeable interfacial layer is observed between β-Ga2O3 and GaN. However, due to the lattice mismatch, grain boundaries and defects are present in β-Ga2O3 originating from the Ga2O3/GaN interface. This work marks an important step towards the formation of high-quality Ga2O3/GaN heterojunctions for various devices.
In-planeatomic arrangements of nitrogen (N) atoms of GaN(bottom) and oxygen (O) atoms of Ga2O3 (top),showing that & beta;-Ga2O3 forms a six-foldin-plane rotational domain. The formation of n-Ga2O3/p-GaN heterojunctions has been studied intensivelydue to the lack of p-Ga2O3.Metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) is known to providea high-quality heterojunction of n-Ga2O3/p-GaN compared to thermal oxidation,sputtering, or pulsed-laser deposition (PLD). In this work, single-crystalline & beta;-Ga2O3 of {-201} is grown on aGaN (001)/Al2O3 substrate using MOCVD. An abruptheterojunction without a noticeable interfacial layer is observedbetween & beta;-Ga2O3 and GaN. However, dueto the lattice mismatch between & beta;-Ga2O3 (-201) and GaN (001), grain boundaries and grain defectsoriginating from the Ga2O3/GaN interface continuein & beta;-Ga2O3 in a diagonal direction. Theepitaxial nature of the grown & beta;-Ga2O3 onthe GaN (001)/Al2O3 substrate causes the nanorod-shapedmorphology in the growth direction of & beta;-Ga2O3. This work marks a step toward the formation of a high-qualityheterojunction of Ga2O3/GaN, which would serveas an essential building block for various devices, including optoelectronicsand power electronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据