4.5 Article

Effect of climatic variables and pheromone trapping strategy on the capture of Cosmopolites sordidus in banana fallows

期刊

CROP PROTECTION
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106501

关键词

Musa AAA Cavendish subgroup; Cosmopolites sordidus; Black banana weevil; Pheromone trap; Martinique; Caribbean region; Sordidin

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares the effectiveness of two fallow trapping patterns and finds that internal trapping of fallow land can clean up plots twice as quickly as trapping surrounding the fallow land. Additionally, trapping efficiency is influenced by climatic conditions, with the wet season being more favorable for trapping than the dry season.
Cosmopolites sordidus is one of the major pests of bananas. The ban on the use of pesticide products as well as the firmness of public opinion on these products makes it imperative to adopt an alternative method that respects the environment. Pheromone mass trapping is a method that meets these conditions and has demonstrated its effectiveness. However, no study has focused on its use in fallow plots, even though fallowing is recognized as an event that makes plots a source of contamination. Our study compares the effectiveness of two fallow trapping patterns by integrating the effect of climatic variables on the capture rate. Our results showed that the trapping of fallow land ensures a real sanitation of C. sordidus. In addition, the internal trapping of fallow land, compared to trapping surrounding the fallow land, cleans up the plots twice as quickly. Furthermore, trapping efficiency is affected by climatic conditions with seasonal variations, the wet season is more favorable to trapping than the dry season. We provide recommendations for the use of trapping considering the effect of climate on the movement of weevils and on the efficiency of pheromone attractivity. Finally, we offer perspectives on the gaps that still need to be filled.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据