4.5 Article

Titanosaurian teeth from the South-central Pyrenees (Upper Cretaceous, Catalonia, Spain)

期刊

CRETACEOUS RESEARCH
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105753

关键词

Cretaceous; Tremp; Sauropoda; Titanosaurs; Dentition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Europe, the fossil record of sauropods in the uppermost Cretaceous is mainly found in Spain, France, and Romania. Recently, a significant discovery of titanosaurs' teeth was made in Els Nerets, Spain, which contains the largest tooth sample from the Late Cretaceous in Europe. The teeth show distinct characteristics but cannot be attributed to any known European species. Based on tooth morphology and wear facets distribution, a new taxon is proposed.
In Europe, the sauropod record of the uppermost Cretaceous (Campanian-Maastrichtian) concentrates in Spain, France, and Romania with up to eight titanosaurian species erected and a similar number of tooth morphotypes described. Recently, the lower Maastrichtian locality of Els Nerets from the Tremp Basin (Catalonia, Spain) has yielded the largest tooth sample for a Late Cretaceous titanosaur in the continent. A comprehensive description of 18 teeth from this locality shows that they have conical and slender crowns, pronounced development of mesial and distal carinae, a lemon-shaped cross-section, and a coarse enamel wrinkling defined by closely packed longitudinal crenulations that anastomose apically. The teeth are among the largest, slender-most, and most labiolingually compressed teeth from the region. Despite several morphological similarities with some other few titanosaur species described in other localities of SW Europe, the dental material from Els Nerets cannot be referred to any known European species. Finally, by using a rationale based on tooth morphology and wear facets distribution we propose a dental configuration of the new yet to be described taxon.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据