4.8 Review

Ionic liquids promoted synthesis, enhanced functions, and expanded applications of porous organic frameworks

期刊

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
卷 493, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215304

关键词

Porous organic frameworks; Ionic liquids; Promoted synthesis; Enhanced functions; Application performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review provides a new perspective on the multifunctional roles of designable ionic liquids (ILs) in porous organic frameworks. It discusses the effects of ILs on promoting synthesis and modulating functions of the frameworks, as well as the roles of ILs in enhancing catalysis, energy storage, and gas adsorption. The review also presents an outlook on challenges and opportunities in the field of ILs with porous organic frameworks.
Porous organic frameworks, such as metal-organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks, have garnered increasing scientific interest owing to their unique properties such as large specific surface areas and diverse structures. However, traditional synthetic strategies and intrinsic limitations restrict their application potential. In this regard, designable ionic liquids (ILs) can provide an ideal ionic microenvironment or serve as active species to endow organic frameworks with additional functions such as conductivity, fluidity, adsorption capacity, and catalytic activity. This review aims to provide a new perspective on the multifunctional roles of ILs in porous organic frameworks, based on the synthesis and applications of the porous organic frameworks. First, the effects of ILs on promoting the synthesis and modulating the functions of porous organic frameworks are discussed comprehensively. Then, the roles of ILs in improving the performance of porous organic frameworks in catalysis, energy storage, and gas adsorption are summarized. Finally, an outlook on challenges and opportunities in the progressing field of ILs with porous organic frameworks is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据