4.5 Article

PET-CT for Evaluation of Spleen and Liver 18F-FDG Diffuse Uptake Without Lymph Node Enlargement in Lymphoma

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 95, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003750

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2012B031800381]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the study was to compare differences between lymphoma and inflammation as indicated by high diffuse uptake of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) in the spleen, liver, and bone marrow without increased F-18-FDG uptake in the lymph nodes and without enlarged peripheral lymph nodes. Eighteen lymphoma patients and 14 inflammation patients were examined with F-18-FDG positron emission tomography-computer tomography (PET-CT). All patients displayed high diffuse uptake of F-18-FDG in the spleen, liver, and bone marrow without increased F-18-FDG uptake in the lymph nodes and without enlarged peripheral lymph nodes. Our analyses compared the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of F-18-FDG uptake ratios between the spleen/liver, the spleen/bone marrow, and the liver/bone marrow and further compared spleen sizes between lymphoma and inflammation patients. Using Student t test, no significant differences were found in the SUVmax ratios of spleen/liver and liver/bone marrow between the lymphoma and inflammation patients (t = 0.853, P = 0.401 > 0.05; t = 1.622, P = 0.115 > 0.05). However, the SUVmax ratio of the spleen/bone marrow of the lymphoma patients was significantly different from that of the inflammation patients (t = 2.426, P = 0.021< 0.05). The spleen size between the lymphoma and inflammation patients was also significantly different (t = 2.911, P = 0.007< 0.05). As indicated by F-18-FDG PET-CT, our study demonstrated that lymphoma and inflammation patients displayed a few differences despite both having high diffuse uptake of F-18-FDG in the spleen, liver, and bone marrow without enlarged peripheral lymph nodes and without increased F-18-FDG uptake in lymph nodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据