4.7 Review

Concrete and steel bridge Structural Health Monitoring-Insight into choices for machine learning applications

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 402, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132596

关键词

Structural Health Monitoring; Machine learning; Deep learning; Neural networks; Long -span bridges; Damage detection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, there has been an increasing installation of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems on bridges worldwide, providing crucial data for bridge assessment and maintenance. Machine Learning (ML) has gained popularity in SHM studies as it can detect damages and perform condition assessment on bridge structures caused by material deterioration. This article summarizes and discusses various ML applications in bridge SHM, providing detailed critiques of each application type, and presents recommendations for future research to fill current gaps.
Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems have been installed on bridges across the world at an increasing rate in recent years, providing vital data for bridge assessment and maintenance. Machine Learning (ML) is efficient in data analyses such as classification and regression, and capable of improving its accuracy by learning from data without the need for step-to-step programming. The implementation of ML methods in bridge SHM studies has become more popular in recent years for its ability to detect damages on concrete and steel caused by material deterioration and to perform condition assessment on bridge structures. There have been several review articles discussing ML applications in SHM which mostly provide broad discussions across different civil engineering structures. In this article, different ML applications in the bridge SHM study are summarised and discussed. Detailed critiques of each types of ML applications are provided. Finally, recommendations are made for the future study of ML applications in bridge SHM to fill the current research gaps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据