4.7 Article

Using woven recycled plastic fibers in reinforced concrete beams

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 404, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133262

关键词

PET rope; Recycled plastic fibers; Reinforced concrete beams; Ductility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The modern lifestyle and advancement in technology have resulted in a significant amount of plastic waste, making recycling of these waste materials a crucial challenge for human societies. This study explores the use of woven recycled plastic fibers as a replacement for steel reinforcements in reinforced concrete beams. Experimental results demonstrate that this method increases the ductility of the concrete beams.
The modern lifestyle, along with the advancement of new technologies has produced plastic waste and the recycling of these waste materials has become an important challenge for human societies. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is one of the most consuming waste materials. A solution to repel these materials is to use them in the civil engineering industry and buried them in concrete. PET layers and strips were used in reinforced concrete beams instead of steel reinforcements by some researchers. But, in this study, the longitudinal and transverse steel bars were replaced by woven recycled plastic fibers and tested experimentally. These woven PET bars are produced by the authors and used as a structural element. Six beams with different combinations of steel and woven PET bars are tested under two-point loading and the experimental and analytical results are presented. The results show that using these fibers concludes to increases the ductility of reinforced concrete beams. By replacing PET ropes instead of one, two and three tensile steel reinforcements, the ductility ratios of the beams are about 1.73, 1.76 and 4.12 times of the reference reinforced concrete beam. Moreover, some theoretical formulation is presented and compared with experimental data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据