4.7 Article

Decision-guided chatbots and cognitive styles in interdisciplinary learning

期刊

COMPUTERS & EDUCATION
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104812

关键词

Teaching; learning strategies; Secondary education; Interdisciplinary projects; Human -computer interface

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to develop a decision-guided chatbot for interdisciplinary learning and investigate its effects on learning achievements, motivation, collective efficacy, engagement, satisfaction, and cognitive load. The results showed that the experimental group using the chatbot outperformed the control group in various aspects. Analytical learners had higher achievements, cognitive engagement, and lower mental load. However, both analytical and intuitive learners in the experimental group perceived higher mental load compared to the control group.
Research on chatbots has distinct interdisciplinary features and can be generalized to learning in various fields. However, related research is still fragmented across disciplines and applications. This study aimed to develop a decision-guided chatbot for interdisciplinary learning. To inves-tigate the effects of this learning model on learning achievements, learning motivation, collective efficacy, classroom engagement, satisfaction with the learning approach, and cognitive load of learners with different cognitive styles, this study was conducted in an environment education course in a junior high school in northern Taiwan. A total of 71 learners from two classes were recruited in this study; the experimental group, a class of 35 learners, adopted a decision-guided chatbot for learning, while the control group, a class of 36 learners, adopted conventional technology-assisted learning. The results showed that the experimental group significantly out-performed the control group on learning achievements, extrinsic motivation, collective efficacy, cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, and satisfaction with the learning approach. Moreover, the experimental group perceived lower mental efforts. In terms of cognitive styles, analytical learners had significantly higher learning achievements than intuitive learners. In the control group, the analytical learners had higher cognitive engagement than intuitive learners. In the experimental group, analytical learners had significantly lower mental load than intuitive learners. In addition, the analytical learners and intuitive learners in the experimental group respectively perceived higher mental load than those in the control group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据