4.6 Article

Designing a resilient supply chain network under ambiguous information and disruption risk

期刊

COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108428

关键词

Resilient supply chain network design; Distributionally robust optimization; Demand uncertainty; Supply chain disruption; Ambiguous chance constraint

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the design of resilient supply chain networks in the event of supply chain disruption. A two-stage distributionally robust optimization model with ambiguous chance constraint is proposed to address the problem under demand uncertainty and disruption scenario. The model is applied to a real case study in Wuhan, China, and provides decision support for planning a resilient supply chain network. The findings from numerical experiments and sensitivity analysis offer valuable insights for industry decision-makers.
In case of supply chain disruption following severe disasters, many supply chains tend to collapse and take a long time to recover. Resilient supply chain network design (RSCND) is an important research problem in supply chain management, which means that the supply chain can maintain continuous supply and quickly restore the supply capability in part destruction. Based on the limited distribution information of uncertain demand, a two-stage distributionally robust optimization (DRO) model with ambiguous chance constraint (ACC) is proposed to solve the RSCND problem under demand uncertainty and disruption scenario to provide decision support for planning the supply chain network. Finally, to verify the effectiveness and practicability of the proposed DRO model, we apply the method to a real case study in Wuhan, China, about designing a resilient RSC network to withstand disruption. By comparison and sensitivity analysis in numerical experiments, some management insights of industry decision-makers are obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据