4.6 Article

Multi-objective inverse design of finned heat sink system with physics-informed neural networks

期刊

COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108500

关键词

Inverse design; Physics -informed neural network; Heat sink; Surrogate model; Multi -objective optimization; Multiphysics field

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a new inverse design method using a physics-informed neural network to identify optimal heat sink designs. A hybrid PINN accurately approximates the governing equations of heat transfer processes, and a surrogate model is constructed for integration with optimization algorithms. The proposed method accelerates the search for Pareto-optimal designs and reduces search time. Comparing different scenarios facilitates real-time observation of multiphysics field changes, improving understanding of optimal designs.
This study proposes a new inverse design method that utilizes a physics-informed neural network (PINN) to parameterize the geometric and operating inputs, enabling the identification of optimal heat sink designs by starting with the desired objectives and working backward. A specialized hybrid PINN is designed to accurately approximate the governing equations of the conjugate heat transfer processes. On this basis, a surrogate model derived from the hybrid PINN is constructed and integrated with multi-objective optimization and decisionmaking algorithms. The results of an example finned heat sink system are presented, showcasing the accelerated search for Pareto-optimal designs. The proposed method nearly halved the search time to approximately 113.9 h in comparison with the traditional methods. Moreover, three representative scenarios-high-performance design, equilibrium design, and low-cost design -were compared to visualize the real-time changes in the multiphysics field, facilitating improved physical inspection and understanding of the optimal designs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据