4.7 Article

Novel bootstrap-based ellipsoidal convex model for non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization with insufficient input data

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2023.116231

关键词

Uncertainty quantification; Ellipsoidal convex model; Insufficient input data; Epistemic uncertainty; Bootstrap method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Performing reliability-based design optimization with insufficient data is challenging. Existing nonprobabilistic models only account for available or known samples, which may lead to hazardous results when data is insufficient. A novel bootstrap-based ellipsoidal convex model (BECM) is proposed to account for both known and unknown data and achieve conservative results in a rational manner.
Performing reliability-based design optimization with insufficient input data is a significant and challenging issue as accurately quantifying epistemic uncertainty can be difficult in such scenarios. Non-probabilistic models can marginally alleviate the need for a large sample size by constructing the boundaries of uncertainty parameters. However, most of the existing nonprobabilistic models account for only the available or known samples. For cases with insufficient data, the compact uncertainty domain may result in considerably hazardous results, particularly for the problems that require high reliability. Therefore, a novel bootstrap-based ellipsoidal convex model (BECM) is proposed herein to account for both known and unknown data. Herein, the bootstrap method is introduced to non-probabilistic convex models for the first time to quantify the ellipsoidal shape uncertainty caused by insufficient input data. Further, the proposed BECM is also integrated into non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization. The entire framework of uncertainty quantification and reliability optimization design for insufficient input data is established. Marginally conservative results can finally be achieved in a rational and objective manner by partially sacrificing the ellipsoid volume. Comprehensive comparisons and detailed discussions on aspects, including the problem complexity, initial sample size, and distribution type, are also conducted. The numerical results show that the BECM displays the best performance in terms of accuracy and robustness. It can achieve an approximate balance between being conservative and taking risks. The significant advantages are also illustrated by an engineering example of linear buckling analysis of stiffened cylindrical shells. & COPY; 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据