4.5 Article

First-principles study of interfaces in Al/SiC metal-matrix composite system

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112444

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

First-principles calculations were used to study the interfaces between Al and SiC, a commonly used strengthening agent in Al/MMC. The study found that C-terminated interfaces exhibited higher work of adhesion than Si-terminated interfaces, indicating stronger interfacial bonding. The electron localization function revealed a covalent character for the chemical bonding between Al and C, while the bonding between Al and Si was predominantly metallic. The work of adhesion for C-terminated interfaces increased with the number of dangling bonds at the interface, while the opposite trend was observed for Si-terminated interfaces. Additionally, the interface energy for Si-terminated interfaces was similar to that of C-terminated interfaces, suggesting the coexistence of both termination types in the Al/SiC system.
First-principles calculations were performed on the interfaces between Al and SiC, which is a widely used strengthening agent in aluminum metal-matrix-composites (Al/MMC). C-terminated interfaces have much larger work of adhesion than Si-terminated interfaces, indicating that the former has much stronger interfacial bonding. The electron localization function shows that the chemical bonding between Al and C has a strong covalent character, while the bonding between Al and Si is largely metallic. As a result of the vastly different chemical bonding, the work of adhesion for C-terminated interfaces increases with the number of dangling bonds at the interface, while the opposite trend was observed for Si-terminated interfaces. Additionally, the interface energy for Si-terminated interfaces is comparable to that for C-terminated interfaces, suggesting both types of terminations can coexist in the Al/SiC system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据