4.5 Article

Effect of periodic image interactions on kink pair activation of screw dislocation

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112369

关键词

Kink pair; Screw dislocation; Activation barrier; Periodic image interactions; Nudged elastic band

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the effect of periodic image interactions on the calculation of activation barriers or formation energies of kink pair of screw dislocation in BCC metals is quantified through combined nudged elastic band (NEB) simulations and theoretical analysis based on dislocation mechanics. The NEB calculation result shows a significant size dependence on the activation barrier at zero and low stresses. The theoretical analysis provides a practical approach to quantify this size effect without the need for time-consuming NEB simulations. In addition, a simple relationship between kink activation barrier and dislocation line length is derived at zero stress, offering a new approach to compute kink pair formation energy based on NEB simulation results.
Periodic boundary condition along a dislocation line is commonly used in computing activation barriers or formation energies of kink pair of screw dislocation in BCC metals. Although the effect of periodic image interactions on the computation results is obvious, there had been no comprehensive analysis on such effect. In this work, we quantify it through combined nudged elastic band (NEB) simulations and theoretical analysis based on dislocation mechanics. The NEB calculation result demonstrates a non-negligible size dependence on the activation barrier at zero and low stresses. The theoretical analysis offers a practical approach to quantify such size effect without the need of time-consuming NEB simulations. Notably, a simple relationship between kink activation barrier and dislocation line length is derived at zero stress, offering a new approach to compute kink pair formation energy based on NEB simulation results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据