4.7 Article

The relationship between the impact position interference and CAI strength of composite sandwich structures under double impacts

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 268, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111092

关键词

Sandwich; Double impacts; CAI; Interference mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the influence of multiple impacts on the compression strength of honeycomb sandwich structures with composite face sheets. It is found that the size of the impactor affects the turning point of the compression strength. Additionally, high impact energy leads to damage in the bottom face sheet and reduces the overall compression strength.
Sandwich structures are susceptible to multiple-impacts, and such multiple-impacts will typically occur at certain distances from each other. Therefore, the influence of five different distances between impact positions (DBIP) and three impact energies on compression after impact (CAI) strength are considered and discussed for honeycomb sandwich structure with composite face sheets in this paper. By comparing two typical impact characteristics, i.e., maximum impact force and displacement, the trend of CAI strength shows a turning-point, which is closely related to the size of the impactor. However, high impact energy (15 J) leads to damage in the bottom face sheet during the second impact, and the presence of damage in both top and bottom face sheet reduces CAI strength, resulting in the turning point of CAI strength not exist. It was observed that there is obvious buckling failure, and some cracks along the width direction from the impact point to the edge after CAI. To provide a more comprehensive understanding of double impacts and CAI behavior, a finite element (FE) model considering different DBIP is developed. In addition, the predicted fraction of energy absorbed by top face sheet, honeycomb core, and bottom face sheet is also obtained to reveal the relationship between the impact position interference and CAI strength.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据