4.7 Article

Addition of silica in the adhesive primer layer of composite systems used to repair leak defects in metallic pipelines

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 321, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117289

关键词

Through -thickness defects in pipelines; Composite repair systems; Primer layer; Thixotropic thickener; Silica powder; Failure pressure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the possibility of adding silica as a low-cost thixotropic thickener to a commercial epoxy resin to facilitate the application of a primer adhesive layer for repairing through-thickness corrosion damage in metal pipes, while maintaining the strength and effectiveness of the repair after curing.
Fibre reinforced polymer composites are often used to repair through-thickness corrosion damage in metal pipes. Usually, a primer adhesive layer is initially applied to the surface of the pipe and then the composite reinforcement is applied in concentric layers. This paper investigates the possibility of adding silica as a low-cost thixotropic thickener to a commercial epoxy resin to facilitate the application of the prime layer while maintaining the strength and effectiveness of the repair after curing. The study of the influence of the silica concentration on the rheological behaviour of the adhesive before fully cured was performed using a rheometer. A preliminary study about the influence of different fractions of silica on the rupture force of metal-composite hybrid bonded joints after full cure showed a good result with the concentration of 1% by weight of epoxy resin. Then, hydrostatic burst tests were carried out on specimens with through-thickness defects, repaired using the same composite, but with two different initial adhesive layers (same surface finish and layer thickness, but with silica and without silica). The study shows that introducing a low fraction of silica facilitates the application of the primer and does not significantly affect the strength of the repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据