4.7 Article

Failure characterisation of sandwich beams using integrated acoustic emission and digital image correlation techniques

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117361

关键词

Failure characterisation; Non-destructive testing (NDT); Acoustic emission (AE); Digital image correlation (DIC); Sandwich structures; Glass fibre reinforced plastics (GFRP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an experimental study on the failure behavior of sandwich beams subjected to bending. The samples used are sandwich beams made of polyethylene terephthalate foam core and glass fiber-reinforced polymer laminate face sheets. In a series of experiments, the integration of diagnostic techniques with acoustic emission and digital image correlation has been proposed to accurately track the cracking process on the surface as well as in the entire volume of the beam. The research program carried out allowed for the observation of various modes of failure in composite specimens. The results obtained showed that the integration of acoustic and optical diagnostic techniques provided complementary results and can be successfully used for failure monitoring in sandwich beams.
The paper presents the experimental study of the failure behaviour of sandwich beams subjected to bending. The samples examined are sandwich beams made of polyethylene terephthalate foam core and glass fibre-reinforced polymer laminate face sheets. In a series of experiments, it has been proposed to integrate diagnostic techniques with acoustic emission and digital image correlation to accurately track the cracking process on the surface as well as in the entire volume of the beam. The research programme carried out allowed observing various modes of failure in composite specimens. The results obtained showed that the integration of acoustic and optical diagnostic techniques provided complementary results and can be used successfully for failure monitoring in sandwich beams.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据