4.7 Article

Failure prediction in a non-crimp basalt fibre reinforced epoxy composite

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117413

关键词

Mechanical characterisation; Finite element analysis; Mechanical properties; Mechanical testing; Failure analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the failure analysis of NCF basalt epoxy composite using in-situ 3-point bend test, standard flexure, and ILSS tests. The results reveal that the damage initiating failure mode is fiber/matrix debonding and matrix cracking in the 90° sub-ply, while final failure occurs due to fiber buckling in the neighboring 0° sub-plies. Finite element analysis shows that shear stresses ranging between 35 and 45 MPa control the matrix cracking in the 90° sub-ply.
Failure analysis in non-crimp fabric (NCF) based fibre reinforced composite materials is challenging due to the complexity associated with multiaxial fabric architectures and the interaction of different failure modes. In this study an in-situ 3-point bend test under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been performed to analyse the failure behaviour of a NCF basalt epoxy composite manufactured by vacuum assisted resin transfer moulding (VaRTM) technique. The failure mechanisms observed during the in-situ 3-point bend test are compared to those from standard (ex-situ) flexure and interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) tests on the same material. Finite element analysis of each test configuration is also conducted to analyse the in-ply stress distributions and to predict the damage initiating stresses. The study reveals that fibre/matrix debonding leading to matrix cracking in the 90 & DEG; sub-ply is the damage initiating failure mode, with final failure occurring due to fibre buckling in neighbouring 0 & DEG; sub-plies. The finite element analysis reveals that matrix cracking in the 90 & DEG; sub-ply is controlled by shear stresses ranging between 35 and 45 MPa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据