4.4 Review

CrownPhos: A Review of Crown Ether Derivatives Decorated with Phosphorus Donors

期刊

COMMENTS ON INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02603594.2023.2255528

关键词

Crown ethers; phosphines; host-guest complexes; catalysis; transition metal complexes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crown ethers are cyclic polyethers that can bind to specific size and charge cations based on their ring size, donor atoms, and geometry. The introduction of other donor atoms can enhance their host-guest chemistry. Phosphorus donors can be added to the crown ethers to create hybrid ligands that selectively bind to different types of cations and transition metal centers. This review focuses on the synthesis and catalytic aspects of crown ethers, aza-crown ethers, and thia-crown ethers appended with phosphorus donors on the periphery.
Crown ethers are cyclic polyethers of varied ring sizes. The ability to bind to cations of specific size and charge is based on the ring size, donor atoms present in the crown cavity, and geometry. The host guest chemistry of crown ethers is further enriched by the introduction of other donor atoms into the crown cavity. For example, aza-crown ethers are crown ethers wherein one or more oxygen atoms are replaced by nitrogen donors. The replacement of donor atoms appreciably alters the ability of the crown cavity to host guest molecules. Phosphorus donors can be introduced to the crown ethers on the periphery to generate hybrid ligands. In these hybrid CrownPhos ligand systems, the crown cavity selectively binds to hard cations and phosphorus donors preferentially bind to soft transition metal centers. The presence of guest cations in the crown ether cavity can alter the steric and electronic properties of the phosphorus donors and thereby modulate catalytic ability. The current review focuses on various synthetic and catalytic aspects of crown ethers, aza-crown ethers, and thia-crown ethers appended with phosphorus donors on the periphery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据