4.6 Article

In-situ study on the heterocoagulation between fine coal particles and coarse glass beads by the particle vision and measurement (PVM) techniques

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.132665

关键词

Heterocoagulation; Microhydrodynamics; DLVO theoretical calculation; Collision frequency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a novel in-situ particle vision and measurement (PVM) system to investigate heterocoagulation between coarse and fine particles in mineral processing. The experimental results showed that the degree of heterocoagulation decreased with increasing pH and stirring speed. Furthermore, under certain hydrodynamic conditions, coal particles were more distributed at the rear of the glass bead.
Heterocoagulation between mineral particles is an important phenomenon in mineral processing. Although various characterization methods have been available for characterizing heterocoagulation, in-situ characterization techniques are still lacking. In the present work, a novel in-situ particle vision and measurement (PVM) system was developed to investigate heterocoagulation between coarse and fine particles, which is consistent with the common situation of mineral processing. The heterocoagulation between fine coal particles and coarse glass beads was observed at different pH values and stirring speeds. It was found that the heterocoagulation degree decreased with the increase of pH, which is consistent with the DLVO theoretical calculation results. The heterocoagulation degree decreased with the increase of stirring speed. This indicated that heterocoagulation can be inhibited by high intensity conditioning. Moreover, it was observed that the coated coal particles were not randomly distributed on the glass bead surface. Under certain hydrodynamic conditions, the coal particles were even more distributed at the rear of the glass bead. It is concluded that the microhydrodynamics has a significant effect on the collision frequency and heterocoagulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据