4.4 Article

The role of glycated hemoglobin in the diagnosis of prediabetes and diabetes mellitus in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome

期刊

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cen.14982

关键词

diabetes; glycated hemoglobin; oral glucose tolerance test; polycystic ovary syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HbA1c showed high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of prediabetes in young women with PCOS, compared to OGTT.
Objective: To compare glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for the diagnosis of prediabetes and diabetes in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).Patients and Design: This cross-sectional study included 154 women aged 20-40 years with a diagnosis of PCOS, who were screened for prediabetes and diabetes by the OGTT and HbA1c. Women with diabetes, hyperprolactinemia, thyroid or adrenal diseases, and anemia and users of hormonal contraception or corticosteroids were excluded.Measurements: Clinical, biochemical and ultrasound data were collected from the electronic medical records. The women were classified as having normal glucose metabolism, prediabetes, or diabetes based on the diagnostic tests. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and the Kappa method was used to assess agreement between the two methods.Results: According to the OGTT and HbA1c values, 79.2% and 76% of the women were within the normal range, respectively, 16.8% and 19.5% had prediabetes, and 4% and 4.5% had diabetes (p > .05). The Kappa coefficient of 0.41 (95% confidence interval: 0.24-0.58) indicated medium agreement between methods. Considering the OGTT as the gold standard, the specificity of HbA1c was 89.5% and sensitivity was 85.7% in the diagnosis of prediabetes and 100% and 66.7%, respectively, in the diagnosis of diabetes.Conclusion: The HbA1c, when compared to the OGTT, showed high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of prediabetes in young women with PCOS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据