4.7 Article

Pre-differentiation GenX exposure induced neurotoxicity in human dopaminergic-like neurons

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 332, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138900

关键词

GenX exposure; PFAS; Epigenome; Dopaminergic neuron; Neurodegenerative disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GenX, a safer alternative to PFOA, has raised safety concerns due to its association with various organ damages. This study systematically assessed the molecular neurotoxicity of low-dose GenX exposure, revealing persistent changes in nuclear morphology, chromatin arrangements, and neuronal characteristics, suggesting GenX as a potential neurotoxin and risk factor for Parkinson's disease.
GenX, also known as hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA) was introduced as a safer alternative to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in 2009. After nearly two decades of applications there are increasing safety concerns about GenX due to its association with various organ damages. Few studies, however, have system-atically assessed the molecular neurotoxicity of low-dose GenX exposure. Here, we evaluated the effects of pre-differentiation exposure of GenX on dopaminergic (DA)-like neurons using SH-SY5Y cell line; and assessed changes in epigenome, mitochondrion, and neuronal characteristics. Low dose GenX exposure at 0.4 and 4 mu g/L prior to differentiation induced persistent changes in nuclear morphology and chromatin arrangements, man-ifested specifically in the facultative repressive marker H3K27me3. We also observed impaired neuronal network, increased calcium activity along with alterations in Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and alpha-Synuclein (alpha Syn) after prior exposure to GenX. Collectively, our results identified neurotoxicity of low-dose GenX exposure in human DA-like neurons following a developmental exposure scheme. The observed changes in neuronal char-acteristics suggest GenX as a potential neurotoxin and risk factor for Parkinson's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据