4.6 Article

Comparative Study on Proton Conductivity and Mechanism Analysis of Two Imidazole Modified Imine-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202302146

关键词

conducting mechanism; imidazole-doped COF; intra-molecular hydrogen bonding; proton conduction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study elucidates the potential impact of intramolecular H-bonds within the pore walls of COFs on proton conductivity. The inclusion of an imidazole group disrupts these intramolecular bonds, leading to the formation of intermolecular H-bonds within the pore channels, thus dramatically increasing proton conductivity. DFT calculations provide further evidence for this inference.
This work elucidates the potential impact of intramolecular H-bonds within the pore walls of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) on proton conductivity. Employing DaTta and TaTta as representative hosts, it was observed that their innate proton conductivities (s) are both unsatisfactory and s(DaTta)< s(TaTta). Intriguingly, the performance of both imidazole-loaded products, Im@DaTta and Im@TaTta is greatly improved, and the s of Im@DaTta (0.91x10(-2) S cm(-1)) even surpasses that of Im@TaTta (3.73x10(-3) S cm(-1)) under 100 ? and 98 % relative humidity. The structural analysis, gas adsorption tests, and activation energy calculations forecast the influence of imidazole on the H-bonded system within the framework, leading to observed changes in proton conductivity. It is hypothesized that intramolecular H-bonds within the COF framework impede efficient proton transmission. Nevertheless, the inclusion of an imidazole group disrupts these intramolecular bonds, leading to the formation of an abundance of intermolecular H-bonds within the pore channels, thus contributing to a dramatic increase in proton conductivity. The related calculation of Density Functional Theory (DFT) provides further evidence for this inference.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据