4.6 Article

Water-Dispersible Carbon Nano-Test Tubes as a Container for Concentrated DNA Molecules

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202301422

关键词

Ca2+-mediated electrostatic interaction; carbon nano-test tube; DNA adsorption; DNA enrichment; nano-container

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water-dispersible carbon nano-test tubes (CNTTs) were prepared using the template technique, with inner and outer diameters of approximately 25 and 35 nm, respectively. The inner carbon surface of these CNTTs was selectively oxidized to introduce carboxy groups. The adsorption behavior of DNA molecules on the oxidized CNTTs (Ox-CNTTs) was studied in the presence of Ca2+ cations, revealing that Ox-CNTTs can selectively attract DNA molecules based on Ca2+-mediated electrostatic interactions.
Water-dispersible carbon nano-test tubes (CNTTs) with an inner and outer diameter of about 25 and 35 nm, respectively, were prepared by the template technique and then their inner carbon surface was selectively oxidized to introduce carboxy groups. The adsorption behavior of DNA molecules on the oxidized CNTTs (Ox-CNTTs) was examined in the presence of Ca2+ cations. Many DNA molecules are attracted to the inner space of Ox-CNTTs based on the Ca2+-mediated electrostatic interaction between DNA phosphate groups and carboxylate anions on the inner carbon surface. Moreover, the total net charge of the DNA adsorbed was found to be equal to the total charge of the carboxylate anions. This selective adsorption into the interior of Ox-CNTTs can be explained from the fact that the electrostatic interaction onto the inner concave surface is much stronger than that on the outer convex surface. On the other hand, the desorption of DNA easily occurs whenever Ca2+ cations are removed by washing with deionized water. Thus, each of Ox-CNTTs works well as a nano-container for a large amount of DNA molecules, thereby resulting in the occurrence of DNA enrichment in the nanospace.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据