4.6 Article

Pattern analysis of the combustions of various copper concentrate tablets using high-speed microscopy and video-based deep learning

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 276, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2023.118822

关键词

Copper smelting; Combustion test; Microscopic videography; Explainable deep learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve the efficiency and energy consumption of smelting, it is important to fully understand the combustion behavior of the complex and ever-changing Cu concentrate with SiO2 flux in a flash smelting shaft. This study used combustion studies involving high-speed digital microscopy and thermal measurements to characterize the combustion behavior of small Cu concentrate tablets. The results showed two temperature ranges of heating retardation during combustion, at approximately 800-1000 and 1150-1200 degrees Celsius.
The combustion behavior of the complex, ever-changing Cu concentrate with SiO2 flux in a flash smelting shaft should be comprehensively understood to improve the efficiency and energy consumption of smelting. To characterize the combustion behavior of each sample, combustion studies involving high-speed digital microscopy and thermal measurements were performed using numerous small Cu concentrate tablets. Generally, two temperature ranges of heating retardation were observed during combustion, at approximately 800-1000 and 1150-1200 degrees C.A novel video-based Cu concentrate classification system was used to successfully recognize the different combustion patterns of tablets with Cu concentrate-SiO2 mixtures under oxidation gas. This classification system also enabled the calculation of the chemical composition of the concentrate by transforming the network output into a probability distribution. The algorithm based on deep learning employed in this study could learn the combustion behaviors of SiO2-containing Cu concentrates using time-series images extracted from video data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据