4.7 Article

Environmentally friendly oxidation pretreatments to produce sugar-based building blocks from dyed textile wastes via enzymatic hydrolysis

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 467, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.143321

关键词

Textile Waste; Dyes; Enzymatic Hydrolysis; Mechanical Refining; Oxidation; Circular Economy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the concern over textile waste management, enzymatic hydrolysis of cotton is a potential pathway to upcycle waste into valuable chemicals. However, persistent dyes hinder enzyme performance. To overcome this, environmentally friendly oxidation methods were used in combination with mechanical refining. The results showed that oxidation improved glucose yield in enzymatic hydrolysis, highlighting the potential of this ecofriendly pathway for generating value-added chemicals from cotton waste.
Given the increasing concern over textile waste management and the proliferation of textile landfills, enzymatic hydrolysis of cotton represents a potential pathway to upcycle textile waste into valuable chemical building blocks. However, this pathway is challenged by the presence of persistent dyes, hindering enzyme performance. To overcome this issue, environmentally friendly and total chlorine free oxidation methods such as ozone and alkaline hydrogen peroxide were used in combination with mechanical refining pretreatment. The results showed that the enzymatic conversion of black-dyed cotton, without oxidation, resulted in a glucose yield of only 60% as compared to 95% for undyed cotton fibers. On the other hand, the inclusion of oxidation processes in the pretreatment stage resulted in a glucose yield of 90% via enzymatic hydrolysis at expense of using low oxidation chemicals and low enzyme charges. This work highlights the potential of oxidation methods, enzymatic hydrolysis, and mechanical refining as an ecofriendly pathway for generating value-added chemicals from cotton textile waste while promoting economic circularity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据