4.7 Article

Heterogeneous burr-like CoNiO2/Ti3C2Tx MXene nanospheres for ultralow microwave absorption and satellite skin application

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 473, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.145409

关键词

Electromagnetic wave absorption; Ultrasmall matching thickness; CoNiO 2 /Ti 3 C 2 T x MXene nanospheres; Stealth satellite; Radar detection distance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a heterogeneous CoNiO2/Ti3C2Tx MXene hybrid absorber with superior electromagnetic wave absorption performance was successfully synthesized. The absorber demonstrated remarkable electromagnetic absorption capacity and potential applications in spacecraft electromagnetic protection and communication devices.
Nowadays, it is still a challenging task to exploit electromagnetic wave absorption (EMA) materials with superior EMA performance under an ultrasmall thickness (approximately 1 mm). In this study, heterogeneous CoNiO2/ Ti3C2Tx MXene hybrid absorbers were successfully synthesized by using a simple and convenient self-assembly process. Benefiting from the increased porosity, heterogeneous interfaces, and multiple polarization processes, the unique burr-like CoNiO2/Ti3C2Tx MXene nanospheres (CNO/MXene-S) exhibited a remarkable EMA capacity with a minimum reflection loss (RLmin) value of -60.61 dB at an ultrasmall thickness of 1.069 mm and -66.79 dB at a matching thickness of 2.565 mm, respectively. The density functional theory (DFT) calculations were utilized to analyze the EMA mechanisms. Furthermore, the satellite radar cross-section (RCS) simulations demonstrated that compared with a non-stealth satellite, a stealth satellite with the CNO/MXene-S absorber exhibited decreased surface reflection of radar waves and a shortened radar detection distance. Therefore, the asprepared CNO/MXene-S absorber with an ultrasmall matching thickness can be highly promising for the electromagnetic protection of spacecraft and electromagnetic communication devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据