4.7 Review

Thermal separation of heavy metals from municipal solid waste incineration fly ash: A review

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 467, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.143344

关键词

Waste incineration fly ash; Heavy metal; Thermal separation; Carbothermal reduction; Molten salts; Chlorination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper comprehensively reviews four thermal separation methods for extracting heavy metals from municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash, comparing them in terms of separation effectiveness, economic feasibility, technical maturity, and environmental impact. Additionally, the possibility of urban mining from MSWI fly ash is evaluated, indicating significant environmental and social benefits despite potentially higher costs. Finally, the limitations of existing thermal separation methods and the focus of further research, including both mechanisms and experimental investigations, are outlined.
Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash is categorized as a hazardous waste owing to the presence of heavy metals. The thermal separation of heavy metals from MSWI fly ash has the potential to not only purify the fly ash, but also enable the recovery of heavy metals. The main thermal separation methods include calcination thermal separation (700-1200 degrees C), chlorination thermal separation (700-1000 degrees C), reduction thermal separation (700-1000 degrees C) and molten salts thermal separation (600-800 degrees C). This paper presents a comprehensive review of these four thermal separation methods, comparing them in terms of separation effectiveness, economic feasi-bility, technical maturity, and environmental impact, etc. Additionally, the possibility of urban mining from MSWI fly ash was evaluated, and the results indicated that while it may be less cost-effective, it could bring significant environmental and social benefits. Finally, the limitations of the existing thermal separation methods and the focus of further research, including both mechanisms and experimental investigations were outlined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据