4.6 Article

Porous Organic Polymer with Free Carboxylic Acids (Carboxy-POP) for Heterogeneous Catalytic One-Pot Synthesis of Xanthenes and Acridines

期刊

CHEMCATCHEM
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202300727

关键词

Acridines; Carboxy-POP; Heterogeneous catalysis; Multicomponent reaction; Xanthenes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A porous organic polymer (POP) with carboxylic acid functionalities, known as Carboxy-POP, has been developed for efficient heterogeneous catalytic reactions. The catalyst exhibits high catalytic activity, easy operation, high yields, short reaction times, and good recyclability.
Porous organic polymers (POPs) - the emergent hydrothermally stable, amorphous and porous materials - have proven to be invaluable for catalytic applications. Through a rational bottom-up design, we have developed a Carboxy-POP, a POP that is adorned by Bronsted acid (COOH) functionalities, for heterogeneous catalysis. The Carboxy-POP has been comprehensively characterized by FT-IR, solid-state 13C NMR, SEM, TEM, etc. It exhibits a moderate porosity with a BET surface area of 381 m2 g-1 and acid concentration of 1.67 mmol/g. Its functional utility as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for one-pot synthesis of a variety of xanthenes and acridines in excellent isolated yields (up to 98 %) is demonstrated. In contrast to the conventional methods, the advantages of the reported metal-free catalytic protocol include ease of operation, excellent isolated yields of the products, facile workup, and shorter reaction times. It is shown that the heterogeneous catalyst can be repetitively used with the catalytic activity almost intact even after 16 reaction cycles. A porous organic polymer (POP) endowed with free carboxylic acid functionalities, that is, Carboxy-POP, has been developed by Friedel-Crafts polyalkylation. Its application as a heterogeneous recyclable catalyst for the synthesis of acridines and xanthenes is demonstrated.image

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据