4.7 Article

Pattern dynamics of a harvested predator-prey model

期刊

CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114153

关键词

Predator-prey model; Harvesting term; Pattern formation; Weakly nonlinear analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the pattern dynamics of a harvested predator-prey model with no-flux boundary conditions. The positive equilibrium types and the direction of Hopf bifurcation are analyzed for the local temporal model. The conditions for the existence of Turing instability and the selection of different patterns are presented using amplitude equations with the assistance of weakly nonlinear analysis. Spot patterns and mixed patterns are displayed in 2D space, on spherical and torus surfaces, demonstrating the strong influence of prey population diffusion rate on pattern structures.
This paper investigates the pattern dynamics of a harvested predator-prey model with no-flux boundary conditions. Firstly, we analyze the positive equilibrium types of the local temporal model. We find that they can be classified as nodes, foci, or centers depending on the harvesting coefficient within a certain parameter range. Furthermore, the direction of the Hopf bifurcation is determined by employing the first Lyapunov coefficient. In the subsequent analysis, we present the conditions for the existence of Turing instability and classify the different pattern selections using amplitude equations with the assistance of weakly nonlinear analysis by treating the harvesting coefficient as a critical parameter. Finally, the spot patterns and mixed patterns are respectively displayed in 2D space, on spherical and torus surfaces with various harvesting coefficient values. Especially, we can numerically demonstrate that the diffusion rate of the prey population will strongly affect the pattern structures of the model. These results can provide a reference for understanding the interaction dynamics of the model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据