4.7 Article

Relationship between defect and strain in oxygen vacancy-engineered TiO2 towards photocatalytic H2 generation

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 49, 期 22, 页码 36244-36250

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.08.305

关键词

Oxygen vacancy; Defect; Strain; Photocatalytic H-2 generation; TiO2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the relationship between defect and strain in oxygen vacancy-engineered photocatalysts, using TiO2 as an example. The results show that high oxygen vacancy concentration and slight strain lead to the optimal photocatalytic H-2 yield.
Photocatalytic H-2 generation is an effective approach to convert solar energy into renewable H-2 energy and has drawn great attentions. To improve the catalytic activity, lots of attentions have been paid to developing advanced strategies, of which oxygen vacancy engineering is considered as a promising one. However, oxygen vacancy induced coexistence of defect and strain makes understanding the essential mechanism of enhanced photocatalytic performance elusive and challenging. Here, the classic photocatalyst TiO2 is selected as a paradigm to reveal the relationship between the accompanied defect and strain in boosting H-2 generation activity. It is found that oxygen vacancy concentration almost shows a volcano-type trend, while strain exhibits a monotonic decrease with increasing the calcination temperature. An optimal photocatalytic H-2 yield of 788 mu mol g(-1) h(-1) is achieved over the TiO2 with high oxygen vacancy concentration but slight strain. This value is 2.5 times higher than the counterpart with low oxygen vacancy concentration and large strain, indicating that oxygen vacancy induced defect instead of strain plays the dominate role in enhancing photocatalytic H-2 generation, which is further verified by theoretical calculations and experimental carrier dynamics analysis. This work uncovers the relationship between defect and strain in oxygen vacancy-engineered photocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据