4.7 Article

Improving functional properties of protective coatings obtained by electrophoretic deposition on steel interconnects for solid oxide cells by tuning particle size distribution

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 49, 期 21, 页码 33818-33827

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.08.074

关键词

Spinel coatings; EPD; ASR; SOFC; SOC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyzes the effect of particle size distribution on the quality of electrophoretic deposition coating. The results show that increasing the fine powder fraction can improve the density of the coating and slow down the growth rate of oxides, leading to a decrease in surface resistance. Samples prepared with admixed powder exhibit the lowest resistivity. Post-test analysis indicates no diffusion of chromium through the fabricated layers, indicating the reliability of the protective barrier.
This paper analyses the effect of particle size distribution in the suspension on the quality of the resulting coating in the electrophoretic deposition of a protective coating on a steel interconnect for solid oxide cells (SOCs). Mn1.5Co1.5O4 commercial powder was subjected to grinding for 2, 4 and 18 h, and admixing it with the finest fraction was used to form thin layers on Crofer 22APU steel. The functional properties of the coatings, such as density and area-specific resistance (ASR) were evaluated over the respective temperature ranges. The resistivity of the coatings was measured in 60 and 1000 h tests. It was shown that the increase of the fine powder fractions yields a higher density layer, which contributes to slowing down the growth rate of the oxide scale and therefore can decrease ASR by 65%. The lowest resistivity was performed by the samples fabricated with the admixed powder. Post-test analysis by FIB/SEM/EDS did not reveal diffusion of chromium through the fabricated layers (after the 1000 h test), which is a key indicator of the reliability of the formed protective barrier.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据