4.7 Article

Preparation of novel porous hydroxyapatite sheets with high Pb2+adsorption properties by self-assembly non-aqueous precipitation method

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 49, 期 18, 页码 30603-30612

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.07.013

关键词

Hydroxyapatite sheet; Nonaqueous precipitation method; Self-assembly; Lead ions adsorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel porous hydroxyapatite sheets with high pore homogeneity were prepared via a self-assembly nonaqueous precipitation method. The material showed excellent adsorption performance for Pb2+ ions and has wide application prospects in wastewater treatment.
Herein, novel porous hydroxyapatite sheets with high pore homogeneity are prepared via a self-assembly nonaqueous precipitation method. The optimized calcium source, phosphorus source and solvent are calcium acetate, disodium hydrogen phosphate and glycerin, respectively. Hexagonal plate-like hydroxyapatite poly crystals form in the replacement-rearrangement groups of raw materials and grow along the (002) crystal plane of the hydroxyapatite phase. Large hydroxyapatite sheets have homogeneous pore sizes of approximately 110 nm and thicknesses of approximately 20 nm. The hydroxyapatite sheets prepared via the nonaqueous precipitation method are highly active carbonate apatite. In a nonaqueous environment, assembly units of hexagonal plate-like hydroxyapatite polycrystals are triggered by the replacement and rearrangement of groups in the raw materials, and they self-assemble to form large hydroxyapatite sheets in the form of edge sharing. The degree of curvature in the process of plate-like hydroxyapatite self-assembly triggers the formation of porous hydroxyapatite sheets. This material has excellent adsorption performance for Pb2+ ions. The material developed in this work has wide application prospects in the fields of adsorption treatment of wastewater containing toxic ions (such as Pb2+), and it is expected to become a novel type of lead ion adsorbent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据