4.7 Article

Chiral induction enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange by Ag@Ag3PO4 and the reaction mechanism

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 49, 期 16, 页码 26548-26557

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.05.189

关键词

Chirality induce; Ag@Ag3PO4; Photocatalysis; Surface plasmon resonance; Methyl orange

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel chiral Ag@Ag3PO4-NaDC composite was synthesized by chiral induction. The introduction of chirality can obviously promote the light absorption ability, broaden the band gap, enhance the oxidation ability, promote the separation of electrons and holes, greatly enhance the plasma resonance effect of silver nanoparticles, and promote the synergistic effect between silver nanoparticles and silver phosphate. Compared with Ag@Ag3PO4, the catalytic degradation ability of chiral Ag@Ag3PO4-NaDC is improved by more than 60%. Therefore, the chiral Ag@Ag3PO4-NaDC composite exhibits excellent photocatalytic performance.
A novel chiral Ag@Ag3PO4-NaDC composite was synthesized by chiral induction. SEM, XRD, CD spectrum, FTIR, UV-vis and XPS were used to study the physical and chemical properties of the materials, and the photocatalytic oxidation ability was evaluated with methyl orange as the target pollutant. The results show that the introduction of chirality can obviously promote the light absorption ability, broaden the band gap, enhance the oxidation ability, promote the separation of electrons and holes, greatly enhance the plasma resonance effect of silver nanoparticles, and promote the synergistic effect between silver nanoparticles and silver phosphate. Compared with Ag@Ag3PO4, the catalytic degradation ability of chiral Ag@Ag3PO4-NaDC is improved by more than 60%. Therefore, the chiral Ag@Ag3PO4-NaDC composite exhibits excellent photocatalytic performance. In the degradation of methyl orange by Ag@Ag3PO4-NaDC, a large amount of center dot O-2(-) and h(+) were formed on the surface, which was the main reason for the oxidation ability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据