4.7 Article

W-doped niobate-based perovskites: Synthesis by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis and structural characterization

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 49, 期 14, 页码 24004-24017

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.05.005

关键词

Alkali niobate-based perovskites; Tungsten-doping; Ultrasonic spray pyrolysis; Structural characterization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanostructured hollow spheres composed of K0.5Na0.5(WxNb1-x)O-3 were synthesized using ultrasonic spray pyrolysis. The W-doping content affected the properties of the [NbO6] octahedra, including morphology, texture, crystalline structure, and polarization. The samples were found to be nanostructured hollow spheres through scanning and transmission electron microscopy analysis, with a balanced framework of micropores and mesopores.
Nanostructured hollow spheres composed of K0.5Na0.5(WxNb1-x)O-3 were synthesized by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis. Correlations between the W-doping content and properties of the [NbO6] octahedra, including morphology, texture, crystalline structure, and polarization were found. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy analysis indicate the present samples are nanostructured hollow spheres. Textural analysis indicates the samples are composed of a balanced framework including micropores (40-50%) and mesopores (50-60%). Structural refinement by the Rietveld method indicated that non-isovalent W6+ cation only occupies the Nb5+ site in the host structure. Several space groups including Amm2, Pbcm, and Pm were used to refine the W-doped K0.5Na0.5NbO3 structure and the best adjustment was reached assuming the co-existence of two distinct symmetries. The FTIR bands associated with a corner-shared NbO6 octahedron suggested an increase in Nb-O bond length in agreement with the Rietveld refinement. In general, ultrasonic spray pyrolysis is an effective methodology for the one-step synthesis of nanostructured crystallites of W-doped niobate-based perovskites with a tailored structure and morphology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据