4.7 Article

Single-cell multi-omics defines the cell-type-specific impact of splicing aberrations in human hematopoietic clonal outgrowths

期刊

CELL STEM CELL
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 1262-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2023.07.012

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the impact of mutated splicing factors on RNA splicing during hematopoiesis was investigated using a combination of genotyping of transcriptomes, long-read single-cell transcriptomics, and proteogenomics. The study found that mutations in the core splicing factor SF3B1 led to expansion of erythroid progenitor cells, as well as stage-specific aberrant splicing during erythroid differentiation. Additionally, the study revealed specific cryptic 30 splice site usage in SF3B1-mutated cells and an erythroid bias in clonal hematopoiesis samples before overt myelodysplastic syndrome.
RNA splicing factors are recurrently mutated in clonal blood disorders, but the impact of dysregulated splicing in hematopoiesis remains unclear. To overcome technical limitations, we integrated genotyping of transcriptomes (GoT) with long-read single-cell transcriptomics and proteogenomics for single-cell profiling of transcriptomes, surface proteins, somatic mutations, and RNA splicing (GoT-Splice). We applied GoT-Splice to hematopoietic progenitors from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients with mutations in the core splicing factor SF3B1. SF3B1mut cells were enriched in the megakaryocytic-erythroid lineage, with expansion of SF3B1mut erythroid progenitor cells. We uncovered distinct cryptic 30 splice site usage in different progenitor populations and stage-specific aberrant splicing during erythroid differentiation. Profiling SF3B1-mutated clonal hematopoiesis samples revealed that erythroid bias and cell-type-specific cryptic 30 splice site usage in SF3B1mut cells precede overt MDS. Collectively, GoT-Splice defines the cell-type-specific impact of somatic mutations on RNA splicing, from early clonal outgrowths to overt neoplasia, directly in human samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据