4.1 Review

Comparison of the effects of preservation methods on structural, biological, and mechanical properties of the human amniotic membrane for medical applications

期刊

CELL AND TISSUE BANKING
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10561-023-10114-z

关键词

Amniotic membrane; Freeze-drying; Cryopreservation; Preservation methods; Fresh tissue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amniotic membrane (AM), as an effective biomaterial in clinical medicine, has various biological functions and benefits. However, the preservation of AM and maintaining its properties is challenging. Establishing standardized protocols for collection and preservation is crucial for optimal tissue quality and patient safety.
Amniotic membrane (AM), the innermost layer of the placenta, is an exceptionally effective biomaterial with divers applications in clinical medicine. It possesses various biological functions, including scar reduction, anti-inflammatory properties, support for epithelialization, as well as anti-microbial, anti-fibrotic and angio-modulatory effects. Furthermore, its abundant availability, cost-effectiveness, and ethical acceptability make it a compelling biomaterial in the field of medicine. Given the potential unavailability of fresh tissue when needed, the preservation of AM is crucial to ensure a readily accessible and continuous supply for clinical use. However, preserving the properties of AM presents a significant challenge. Therefore, the establishment of standardized protocols for the collection and preservation of AM is vital to ensure optimal tissue quality and enhance patient safety. Various preservation methods, such as cryopreservation, lyophilization, and air-drying, have been employed over the years. However, identifying a preservation method that effectively safeguards AM properties remains an ongoing endeavor. This article aims to review and discuss different sterilization and preservation procedures for AM, as well as their impacts on its histological, physical, and biochemical characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据