4.7 Article

Acetophenone hydrogenation and consecutive hydrogenolysis with Pd/CNT catalysts: Highlighting the synergy between single atoms and nanoparticles by kinetic modeling

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 422, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2023.114196

关键词

Palladium single atom catalyst; Palladium nanoparticles; Carbon nanotubes; Acetophenone; Kinetic modeling; Hydrogen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the cooperative action of palladium nanoparticles (NPs) and palladium single atoms (SAs) supported on Ni is essential for developing more efficient supported transition metal catalysts. This work compared a series of Pd-catalysts on CNTs with the same palladium loading but different SA/NP ratios and demonstrated a synergy between the two palladium species (SAs and NPs). The study also identified the optimal distribution of surface palladium for maximum activity in the chosen test reactions.
Understanding the cooperative action of palladium nanoparticles (NPs) and palladium single atoms (SAs) supported on Nis essential for developing more efficient supported transition metal catalysts. In this work, the comparison of a series of Pd-catalysts on CNTs having the same palladium loading (similar to 1.4 wt%) but involving different and controlled SA/NP ratios (between 2 and 200) is described. The hydrogenation of acetophenone into 1-phenylethanol and its consecutive hydrogenolysis to ethylbenzene are the chosen test reactions. Appropriate kinetic modeling of these two consecutive reactions was performed and allowed a quantitative assessment of the activity differences between catalysts as well as the demonstration of a synergy between the two palladium species (SAs and NPs). The maximum activity was clearly dependent on the distribution of the surface palladium between SAs and NPs, and interestingly, different optima for the two reactions are evidenced. This work may offer a new perspective for the design and synthesis of supported transition metal catalysts with targeted catalytic performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据