4.8 Article

Boron carbon nitride nanosheets via induction plasma: Insights on synthesis, characterization, and control of band gap

期刊

CARBON
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2023.118472

关键词

Boron carbon nitride nanosheets (BCNNS); Graphene nanoflakes (GNF); Boron nitride nanosheets (BNNS); Band gap; Semiconductors; Inductively coupled plasma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Band gap-controlled two-dimensional boron carbon nitride nanosheets were synthesized using a thermal plasma-based process, with the ability to control the band gap achieved by manipulating the carbon content. The nanosheets exhibited non-uniform layer stacking and dislocation-type defects, with a quasi-uniform distribution of B/N/C. The optical band gap increased as the carbon content decreased.
Band gap-controlled two-dimensional boron carbon nitride nanosheets (BCNNS) were synthesized via a scalable one-step thermal plasma-based process near atmospheric pressure. Monotonic change in the band gap of BCNNS from 2.4 to 4.1 eV was achieved through manipulating the carbon loading during the nanosheet formation from ammonia borane and methane. Electron microscopy images showed 2D structures with sizes of 100-200 nm and 1.1-3.7 nm in sheet thickness (3-10 atomic layers). The sheets displayed non-uniformity in layer stacking and dislocation-type defects indicating the inclusion of BN in the C framework. Quasi-uniform distribution of the B/ N/C was shown through energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The presence of these elements as well as the sp2 hybridization of the bonding were confirmed using electron energy loss spectroscopy. Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy showed the presence of B-N/B--N, C-N/C--N, and C-B/C--B groups, and Raman spectroscopy showed progressive graphitization across the BCNNS samples as the BN content is decreased. The optical band gap of various samples is estimated using the Tauc method and found to increase as the carbon content decreased.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据