4.7 Article

Vancomycin-loaded methylcellulose aerogel scaffolds for advanced bone tissue engineering

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 324, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121536

关键词

3D-printing; Aerogels; Supercritical sterilization; Vancomycin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a novel processing strategy to manufacture drug-loaded and personalized aerogels with nanostructures. The aerogels demonstrated bioactivity and antimicrobial effects, promoting bone regeneration and preventing infections in bone tissue engineering.
Scaffolds grafting combined with local delivery of antibiotics at the injury site may promote bone regeneration along with prevention of infections. In this work, a processing strategy combining the 3D-printing of polysaccharide-based inks with supercritical (sc)CO2 technology was employed to manufacture drug-loaded, nanostructured, and personalized-to-patient aerogels for the first time. Methylcellulose (MC) was employed as graft matrix endowed with nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) to confer bioactivity as required in bone tissue engi-neering (BTE). MC-nHA aerogels were obtained through the 3D-printing of hydrogel-based scaffolds followed by scCO2 drying. Aerogels were loaded with vancomycin (VAN), an antibiotic employed in the management of bone infections. Textural properties and printing fidelity of scaffolds were studied as well as VAN release, long-term bioactivity, and pre-osteoblasts mineralization. In vitro cell studies and in vivo Artemia salina tests were carried out to evaluate the potential toxicity of the antibiotic-loaded aerogels. Aerogels efficacy in inhibiting bacterial growth was assessed by antimicrobial tests with Staphylococcus aureus. Textural stability of the aerogels after 7 months of storage was also evaluated. Obtained results showed that the scaffolds promoted the intended two-in -one effect (bone repair and infection management simultaneously) in a personalized way, regulating formulation design, drug dose, and porosity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据