4.7 Article

Spatial distribution and functional relevance of FGFR1 and FGFR2 expression for glioblastoma tumor invasion

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 571, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216349

关键词

Fibroblast growth factor; Migration; Xenograft; RNA sequencing; Cancer stem cell

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma, the most lethal brain cancer in adults, is characterized by heterogeneity, therapy resistance, and infiltration. The fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) signaling pathway plays a role in therapy resistance and cancer stemness. FGFR1 has been found to be associated with poorer survival and tumor invasion in glioblastoma.
Glioblastoma is the most lethal brain cancer in adults. These incurable tumors are characterized by profound heterogeneity, therapy resistance, and diffuse infiltration. These traits have been linked to cancer stem cells, which are important for glioblastoma tumor progression and recurrence. The fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) signaling pathway is a known regulator of therapy resistance and cancer stemness in glioblastoma. FGFR1 expression shows intertumoral heterogeneity and higher FGFR1 expression is associated with a significantly poorer survival in glioblastoma patients. The role of FGFR1 in tumor invasion has been studied in many cancers, but whether and how FGFR1 mediates glioblastoma invasion remains to be determined. Here, we investigated the distribution and functional relevance of FGFR1 and FGFR2 in human glioblastoma xenograft models. We found FGFR1, but not FGFR2, expressed in invasive glioblastoma cells. Loss of FGFR1, but not FGFR2, significantly reduced cell migration in vitro and tumor invasion in human glioblastoma xenografts. Comparative analysis of RNA-sequencing data of FGFR1 and FGFR2 knockdown glioblastoma cells revealed a FGFR1-specific gene regulatory network associated with tumor invasion. Our study reveals new gene candidates linked to FGFR1-mediated glioblastoma invasion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据