4.7 Article

Metronomic chemotherapy as a potential partner of immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic colorectal cancer treatment

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 565, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216236

关键词

Low dose chemotherapy; Combination; Immune checkpoint inhibitor; Colorectal cancer

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in clinical practice for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is currently limited to a small subset of patients. Combining ICIs with anti-angiogenic inhibitors has shown promising efficacy in early phase trials. Additionally, low-dose metronomic (LDM) chemotherapy has potential as a combination partner with ICIs for immunologically cold mCRC tumors.
The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in clinical practice for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is currently limited to patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), which comprise less than 5% of all mCRC cases. Combining ICIs with anti-angiogenic in-hibitors, which modulate the tumor microenvironment, may reinforce and synergize the anti-tumor immune responses of ICIs. In mCRCs, combinations of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib have shown good efficacy in early phase trials. These results suggest the potential utility of immune modulators as partners in combination treatment with ICIs in immunologically cold microsatellite stable, as well as hot dMMR/MSI-H tumors. Unlike conventional pulsatile maximum tolerated dose chemotherapy, low-dose metronomic (LDM) chemotherapy re-cruits immune cells and normalizes vascular-immune crosstalk, similar to anti-angiogenic drugs. LDM chemo-therapy mostly modulates the tumor stroma rather than directly killing tumor cells. Here, we review the mechanism of LDM chemotherapy in terms of immune modulation and its potential as a combination partner with ICIs for the treatment of patients with mCRC tumors, most of which are immunologically cold.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据