4.6 Article

Comparative analysis of five convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility assessment

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-023-03408-9

关键词

Landslide susceptibility; Deep learning; Convolutional neural network; Comparative analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the performance of different convolutional neural networks (CNN) in landslide susceptibility mapping, and found that CNN networks have higher accuracy compared to traditional methods. Among the networks, AlexNet and Xception performed better in landslide susceptibility assessment.
To evaluate the performance of deep learning methods on the landslide susceptibility mapping, five different convolutional neural networks (CNN)-AlexNet, Inception-v3, Xception, ResNet-101, and DenseNet-201-were employed to predict the landslide susceptibility along a transmission line. Ten landslide influencing factors were extracted from three databases and considered in the input layers. The landslide (10,481 grids) and non-landslide (10,481 grids) data were randomly subdivided into 70% (14,673 grids) and 30% (6289 grids) to construct the training and validation samples, respectively. The appropriate architecture and training parameters were carefully selected after many attempts until the training and validation accuracy was above 90%. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, landslide density (LD), and landslide ratio (LR) were determined to estimate the five CNN networks' prediction accuracy. All CNN networks had high area-under-the-curve (AUC) values when assessing landslide susceptibility, and most landslides occurred in the outputs with predicted high and very high landslide susceptibility (LD > 65% and LR > 2.90). Generally, CNN networks had a higher accuracy than the two traditional methods due to the powerful capability of deep feature extraction. Additionally, the computational time cost in three steps was recorded to investigate the efficiency of five CNN networks, and all CNN networks accomplished the goals within an acceptable time using a commercially available computer (similar to 24 h). Comparatively, AlexNet and Xception had better performance than other networks on the landslide susceptibility assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据