Indoor airflow field reconstruction using physics-informed neural network

Obtaining a detailed indoor airflow field is important for the accurate and efficient control of indoor environmental comfort. Traditional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods and CFD-based surrogate models are time-consuming and sometimes produce inaccurate results because of difficulties in reproducing accurate inlet boundary conditions. Artificial neural networks (ANN) can be utilized to reconstruct indoor airflow fields directly from measurement data without building a large inaccurate and time-consuming CFD database. How-ever, as a purely data-driven method, a normal ANN can yield unphysical results. A physics-informed neural network (PINN) is one possible solution. In this study, a PINN was introduced to reconstruct an indoor airflow field basing on measurement data (without inlet boundary conditions), and compared with ANN. The results show that the PINN produced more physical results than the ANN and is more tolerant to a reduction in the number of measurement points. In specific cases, the mean errors of the PINN results for the 98-, 32, and 16 point cases were 89%, 79%, and 70% of those of the ANN results, respectively. The PINN showed practical application potential in cases where the amount of measured data was relatively small. Comparing to traditional CFD, PINN can reconstruct the detailed airflow field directly from measurement data, avoiding inaccurate simulation conditions. Meanwhile, PINN saved 42% calculation time, comparing to CFD. Moreover, there is a potential of PINN in using less time to apply a trained PINN to a new case by transfer learning, where however CFD needs to recalculate a new case.

Automated summary

Obtaining a detailed indoor airflow field is crucial for accurately controlling indoor environmental comfort. Traditional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods are time-consuming and may produce inaccurate results due to difficulties in reproducing accurate inlet boundary conditions. Artificial neural networks (ANN) can directly reconstruct the airflow field from measurement data, but may yield unphysical results. A physics-informed neural network (PINN) was introduced in this study to reconstruct the airflow field without inlet boundary conditions and showed more physical results than ANN, proving its potential in practical applications.