4.7 Article

Automated fault detection and diagnosis of chiller water plants based on convolutional neural network and knowledge distillation

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 245, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110885

关键词

Fault diagnostics; Data-driven; Knowledge distillation; Convolutional neural network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses knowledge distillation to reduce the number of model parameters and deployment cost while maintaining the accuracy of automated fault detection and diagnosis. The experimental results show that the knowledge distillation algorithm achieves high accuracy in image classification.
Automated fault detection and diagnosis (AFDD) plays a crucial role in enhancing the energy efficiency of air-conditioning systems; its quantitative impact has gained greater clarity in recent years. Deep learning has emerged as a promising tool for image classification, and its application in the context of AFDD of heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems is gaining traction owing to its exceptional performance. However, the deployment cost of deep models in practical scenarios increases owing to the large number of parameters involved. This study uses knowledge distillation to significantly reduce the number of model parameters and the cost of model deployment without compromising the accuracy of AFDD. This case study builds a simulation model and 31 types of fault datasets based on an actual HVAC in Japan. We transformed the time series into two-dimensional image tensors via the Graham angle field to apply state-of-the-art image classification algorithms for AFDD. Based on these findings, it is evident that the proposed teacher model can achieve a remarkable top-1 accuracy of 88.45 % and top-5 accuracy of 99.78 %. Furthermore, the knowledge distillation algorithm performed equally well, if not better than the teacher model, with a top-1 accuracy of 88.12 % and a top-5 accuracy of 100 %. This was achieved with a significant reduction in the number of parameters by up to 56%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据