4.5 Article

Adverse drug events caused by three high-risk drug-drug interactions in patients admitted to intensive care units: A multicentre retrospective observational study

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15882

关键词

adverse drug events; drug-drug interactions; intensive care; patient safety; triggers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Limited knowledge about adverse drug events caused by drug-drug interactions (DDI-ADEs), this study aimed to provide detailed insights about DDI-ADEs related to three frequent, high-risk potential DDIs in critical care settings. Through retrospective data analysis from ICU patients admitted to ten hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2010 and September 2019, it was found that DDI-ADEs have a high preventability and severity rate.
AimsKnowledge about adverse drug events caused by drug-drug interactions (DDI-ADEs) is limited. We aimed to provide detailed insights about DDI-ADEs related to three frequent, high-risk potential DDIs (pDDIs) in the critical care setting: pDDIs with international normalized ratio increase (INR+) potential, pDDIs with acute kidney injury (AKI) potential, and pDDIs with QTc prolongation potential.MethodsWe extracted routinely collected retrospective data from electronic health records of intensive care units (ICUs) patients (& GE;18 years), admitted to ten hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2010 and September 2019. We used computerized triggers (e-triggers) to preselect patients with potential DDI-ADEs. Between September 2020 and October 2021, clinical experts conducted a retrospective manual patient chart review on a subset of preselected patients, and assessed causality, severity, preventability, and contribution to ICU length of stay of DDI-ADEs using internationally prevailing standards.ResultsIn total 85 422 patients with & GE;1 pDDI were included. Of these patients, 32 820 (38.4%) have been exposed to one of the three pDDIs. In the exposed group, 1141 (3.5%) patients were preselected using e-triggers. Of 237 patients (21%) assessed, 155 (65.4%) experienced an actual DDI-ADE; 52.9% had severity level of serious or higher, 75.5% were preventable, and 19.3% contributed to a longer ICU length of stay. The positive predictive value was the highest for DDI-INR+ e-trigger (0.76), followed by DDI-AKI e-trigger (0.57).ConclusionThe highly preventable nature and severity of DDI-ADEs, calls for action to optimize ICU patient safety. Use of e-triggers proved to be a promising preselection strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据