4.7 Article

Second messenger signalling bypasses CGRP receptor blockade to provoke migraine attacks in humans

期刊

BRAIN
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad261

关键词

calcitonin; migraine model; cranial arteries; vasodilation; PACAP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that migraine attacks can be triggered by cAMP-mediated mechanisms without the activation of CGRP receptors. This opens up new possibilities for the development of mechanism-based drugs for the treatment of migraines.
There are several endogenous molecules that can trigger migraine attacks when administered to humans. Notably, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been identified as a key player in a signalling cascade involved in migraine attacks, acting through the second messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in various cells, including intracranial vascular smooth muscle cells. However, it remains unclear whether intracellular cAMP signalling requires CGRP receptor activation during a migraine attack in humans. To address this question, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial using a human provocation model involving the administration of CGRP and cilostazol in individuals with migraine pretreated with erenumab or placebo. Our study revealed that migraine attacks can be provoked in patients by cAMP-mediated mechanisms using cilostazol, even when the CGRP receptor is blocked by erenumab. Furthermore, the dilation of cranial arteries induced by cilostazol was not influenced by the CGRP receptor blockade. These findings provide clinical evidence that cAMP-evoked migraine attacks do not require CGRP receptor activation. This discovery opens up new possibilities for the development of mechanism-based drugs for the treatment of migraine. Using a human migraine provocation model, Do et al. provide clinical evidence that cAMP-evoked migraine attacks do not require CGRP receptor activation. These findings open up new avenues for mechanism-based drug development for migraine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据