4.8 Article

Expanding hepatitis C virus test uptake using self-testing among men who have sex with men in China: two parallel randomized controlled trials

期刊

BMC MEDICINE
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-02981-w

关键词

Hepatitis C virus; HCV; Self-testing; Men who have sex with men; MSM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effectiveness and cost of providing HCV self-testing (HCVST) among MSM in China, and found that HCVST significantly increased the proportion of MSM testing for HCV and was cost-effective.
BackgroundHCV self-testing (HCVST) may be an effective strategy to address low rates of HCV test uptake among men who have sex with men (MSM). We evaluated the effectiveness and cost of providing HCVST to increase HCV test uptake among MSM in China.MethodsTwo parallel, unmasked, individual-level randomized controlled trials were conducted. HIV-negative MSM and MSM living with HIV were enrolled from 22 cities in China. Men in both trials were randomly assigned (1:1) into standard-of-care (SOC) or HCVST arms. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who tested for HCV during the trial period. Intervention effects were estimated using multiply imputed data in the main analysis. Costs were measured using a micro-costing approach.ResultsA total of 84 men who were HIV-negative (trial 1) and 84 men living with HIV were enrolled (trial 2). Overall, the proportion of individuals who underwent HCV testing during the trial period was higher in the HCVST arm compared to SOC in trial 1 (estimated risk difference (RD): 71.1%, 95% CI: 54.6 to 87.7%) and trial 2 (estimated RD: 62.9%, 95% CI: 45.7 to 80.1%). Over half (58.6%, 34/58) of HCV self-testers reported the self-test was their first HCV test. The cost per person tested in trial 1 was $654.52 for SOC and $49.83 for HCVST, and in trial 2 was $438.67 for SOC and $53.33 for HCVST.ConclusionsCompared to the standard of care, providing HCVST significantly increased the proportion of MSM testing for HCV in China, and was cheaper per person tested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据