4.4 Article

Benefits and challenges of telemedicine for heart failure consultations: a qualitative study

期刊

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09872-z

关键词

Heart failure; Telemedicine; Remote consultation; Digital health; Qualitative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, heart failure (HF) disease management programmes were predominantly in-person, but the pandemic necessitated a shift to teleconsultations. Telemedicine consultations were found to be more convenient for patients, saved them time, and were generally acceptable to clinicians. However, it also brought changes to workflows, consultation dynamics, and clinical assessment methods.
BackgroundPrior to the Covid-19 pandemic, heart failure (HF) disease management programmes were predominantly delivered in-person, with telemedicine being uncommon. Covid-19 resulted in a rapid shift to remote-by-default clinic appointments in many organisations. We evaluated clinician and patient experiences of teleconsultations for HF.MethodsFrom 16th March 2020, all HF appointments at a specialist centre in the UK were telemedicine-by-default through a mixture of telephone and video consultations, with rare in-person appointments. HF clinicians and patients with HF were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews about their experiences. A purposive sampling technique was used. Interviews were conducted using Microsoft Teams & REG;, recorded and transcribed verbatim. Narrative data were explored by thematic analysis. Clinicians and patients were interviewed until themes saturated.ResultsEight clinicians and eight patients with HF were interviewed before themes saturated. Five overarching themes emerged: 1) Time utilisation - telemedicine consultations saved patients time travelling to and waiting for appointments. Clinicians perceived them to be more efficient, but more administrative time was involved. 2) Clinical assessment - without physical examination, clinicians relied more on history, observations and test results; video calls were perceived as superior to telephone calls for remote assessment. Patients confident in self-monitoring tended to be more comfortable with telemedicine. 3) Communication and rapport - clinicians experienced difficulty establishing rapport with new patients by telephone, though video was better. Patients generally did not perceive that remote consultation affected their rapport with clinicians. 4) Technology - connection issues occasionally disrupted video consultations, but overall patients and clinicians found the technology easy to use. 5) Choice and flexibility - both patients and clinicians believed that the choice of modality should be situation-dependent.ConclusionsTelemedicine HF consultations were more convenient for patients, saved them time, and were generally acceptable to clinicians, but changed workflows, consultation dynamics, and how clinical assessment was performed. Telemedicine should be used alongside in-person appointments in a hybrid model tailored to individual patients and settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据