4.7 Article

Detailed safety profile of acalabrutinib vs ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the ELEVATE-RR trial

期刊

BLOOD
卷 142, 期 8, 页码 687-699

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022018818

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ELEVATE-RR trial showed that acalabrutinib has noninferior progression-free survival and lower incidence of key adverse events compared to ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Post hoc analysis further characterized the adverse events of acalabrutinib and ibrutinib. It was found that acalabrutinib had higher incidence rates of headache and cough, while ibrutinib had higher rates of diarrhea, joint pain, urinary tract infection, back pain, muscle spasms, and dyspepsia. Ibrutinib also had higher rates of atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and bleeding. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was lower with acalabrutinib. The overall event-based analyses and adverse event burden scores demonstrated that ibrutinib had a higher burden of adverse events compared to acalabrutinib, particularly in atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and bleeding.
ELEVATE-RR demonstrated noninferior progression-free survival and lower incidence of key adverse events (AEs) with acalabrutinib vs ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We further characterize AEs of acalabrutinib and ibrutinib via post hoc analysis. Overall and exposure-adjusted incidence rate was assessed for common Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor-associated AEs and for selected events of clinical interest (ECIs). AE burden scores based on previously published methodology were calculated for AEs overall and selected ECIs. Safety analyses included 529 patients (acalabrutinib, n = 266; ibrutinib, n = 263). Among common AEs, incidences of any-grade diarrhea, arthralgia, urinary tract infection, back pain, muscle spasms, and dyspepsia were higher with ibrutinib, with 1.5- to 4.1-fold higher exposure-adjusted incidence rates. Incidences of headache and cough were higher with acalabrutinib, with 1.6- and 1.2-fold higher exposureadjusted incidence rate, respectively. Among ECIs, incidences of any-grade atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and bleeding were higher with ibrutinib, as were exposureadjusted incidence rates (2.0-, 2.8-, and 1.6-fold, respectively); incidences of cardiac events overall (the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities system organ class) and infections were similar between arms. Rate of discontinuation because of AEs was lower for acalabrutinib (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.93). AE burden score was higher for ibrutinib vs acalabrutinib overall and for the ECIs atrial fibrillation/ flutter, hypertension, and bleeding. A limitation of this analysis is its open-label study design, which may influence the reporting of more subjective AEs. Overall, event-based analyses and AE burden scores demonstrated higher AE burden overall and specifically for atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and hemorrhage with ibrutinib vs acalabrutinib. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02477696.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据